Paper debate with New Mexicans for Science and Reason (NMSR) concluded in May 2001. Topics were alternately proposed by CSFNM and NMSR. Two months were spent on each topic with a 1,000 word essay written by both organizations the first month and a 500 word rebuttal written by both organizations the second month. The essays were posted on respective websites and printed in respective newsletters. Topics are (proposed by org in paren): Jun/Jul 2000 - (CSFNM) Evolution is not science      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal. Aug/Sep 2000 - (NMSR) Creationism does not meet the requirements of a scientific theory      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal. Oct/Nov 2000 - (CSFNM) Genetics and biochemistry do not admit evolution as science      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal. Dec/Jan 2001 - (NMSR) Current scientific dating methods are sufficient to establish the age of the earth as over four billion years      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal. Feb/Mar 2001 - (CSFNM) Information theory and Physics do not admit evolution as science      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal. Apr/May 2001 - (NMSR) Biblical inconsistencies rule out a literal interpretation of the Genesis creation story      CSFNM essay. NMSR essay.      NMSR rebuttal. CSFNM rebuttal.