Slide 14 of 25

Notes:

62 million years may sound like a lot, but it is 50 times younger than the evolutionists want.

Also, I think Steve and I have closed all the major loopholes in this argument. Dozens of evolutionists have had a chance to critique the ideas in the paper, and thus far, none has come up with a workable way around the conclusion.

Thus this is pretty strong evidence that there is something seriously wrong with evolutionary dating methods for the age of the ocean.

The paper got 2nd prize at the 1990 ICC. I have a few copies here, if you want to see it.

Let's move on to something even the most non-technical person can understand: people ...

Evidence for a Young World
D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D.